Which doesn't make much sense since that means the efficacy of using special operators to reduce cruft has diminished. Although both have a first link that is self referential the old method clearly has a 2nd result that links to the support page for Kodak and the summary says they don't support linux.Įdit 3: To be clear the above screenshot comparison shows that the default results (which are now displayed when using "+") are better than the suggested search for this particular example. This will also probably break some scripts and programs that use the modifier for results not to mention add more keystrokes.Įdit: More detailed description of the "+" operator can be found here.Įdit 2: Using the example in the help forum link I posted here is a screenshot comparison of results using the suggested method vs. NOT: Excludes certain keywords from your results. OR: Either of the keywords must appear in the results. There are three Boolean Operators: AND: All keywords must appear in your results.
I hope this isn't going to set a trend of removing more boolean modifiers as they are quite useful for getting better results. NOT NOT will provide search results containing the first of your keywords but not the second. Using a Boolean Operator will tell the database to connect the terms together in your search. To search for an exact word or phrase, use double quotation marks." Is this as new as this suggests or have I missed the switch due to using alternative search engines? Start searching for tweets, articles, titles, and bios with some suggested searches: Companies or Topics (e.g. We’ve compiled this guide to help you make the most of your search. I just noticed this today when using a "+" for searches Google returns: "The + operator has been replaced. Boolean search query makes it simple to find people, tweets, or articles that mention any name, keyword, company, hashtag, etc.
0 kommentar(er)
